Skip to content
eNotaryPublic.ca
Get Started

Drafting

The modified jurat for remote commissioning: wording and pitfalls

The jurat has to show the act was done remotely. A jurat copied from an in-person precedent misstates the process.

Mon, Sep 14, 2026

Two professionals reviewing documents together at a laptop.Illustrative scene
A thoughtful approachA clearer way to work together.

What the jurat records

The jurat is the block that records that the document was sworn, affirmed or declared before you, by whom, where and when. For a remote appointment it also needs to show that the oath or declaration was administered by audio-visual communication technology under the Ontario regulation.

A sample form

A commonly used form reads along the lines of: “Sworn (or Affirmed or Declared) before me remotely by [name] of the City of [city], in the Province of [province], via audio-visual communication technology in accordance with O. Reg. 431/20, on [date].” Adapt the wording to the document and to current practice; this is an illustration, not a prescribed form.

Common pitfalls

The frequent error is using an in-person jurat unchanged, so the document reads as though the parties met in the same room. Others: recording an oath when the deponent affirmed, mismatched dates between the signature and the jurat, and leaving the place blank. Each of these invites a later challenge.

Consistency with your record

The jurat and your appointment record should tell the same story — same date, same deponent, same remote method. An inconsistency between the face of the document and your record is exactly what an opposing party looks for.

Practice information, not a substitute for your own judgment.

Verified authority, your own hours. The platform brings screened requests and handles the admin.

This page is general information, not legal advice. Acceptance of any document is always the receiving organization's decision. Prices shown exclude applicable tax unless stated.